The Constitution itself does not prohibit secession, I think only
the interpretation of the defeaters prohibits secession. I found this very interesting;
Cheif Justice Roger Taney explained why succession is unconstitutional in a
memorandum on 1 February 1861. (This is the Chief Justice of the United States BEFORE the Civil War even
started)"The South contends that a state has a constitutional right to
secede from the Union formed with her sister states. In this I submit the South
errs. No power or right is constitutional but what can be exercised in a form
or mode provided in the constitution for its exercise. Secession is therefore
not constitutional, but revolutionary; and is only morally competent, like war,
upon failure of justice." In other words, there is no way for the concept
of independent secession to be exercised under the US Constitution, for no mode
or form of such is provided in that document. Honestly I don't think Texas should secede for many reasons. Texas was crushed the first
time and will be crushed again if it tries to secede from the union it
voluntarily entered into. Another thing is that Gov. Rick Perry opposes the
idea, dismisses it as silly and says to move on. Texas needs federal money to
balance its budget, and the Texas Constitution requires a balanced budget. I
honestly have no idea how they plan on Texas to go it alone. There’s a lot of boasting about the our
economy and how it’s the best, but I haven’t seen or heard a solid plan as of
yet.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Friday, November 30, 2012
Education in Texas
When people think of Texas and education, the first thing
that comes to their mind is UT and how bad our education is. Even though Texas has
been a leader among the U.S to improve the quality of public education, it is
facing challenges in preparing students for success. The state’s student
population has become more diverse over the last decade. In addition, The Texas
Education Agency (TEA) reports that 127 languages are spoken by the state’s
schoolchildren. In 1990, the Texas Legislature established the state’s first
accountability system for public education based on school district and campus
ratings tied to certain measurable indicators. The system currently uses TAKS
test scores, alternative test scores for Special Education students, annual
dropout rates and school completion rates. Using these indicators, the system
rates school districts and campuses as “Exemplary,” “Recognized,” “Academically
Acceptable” or “Academically Unacceptable.” According to the TAKS web page on
2011, 21 schools were rated Academically
Unacceptable. 628 were rated Exemplary;
2,317 were rated Recognized; 3,891 were rated Academically Acceptable; 232 were
rated Academically Unacceptable; and 661 were listed as “Not Rated: Other. In addition, Texas has also instituted the
“Student Success Initiative,” which requires students to pass the TAKS reading
assessment or an approved alternate test in third grade to advance to fourth
grade. Students must also meet requirements for reading and mathematics in
fifth grade and in eighth grade to be promoted to the next grade. Also to
stronger graduation requirements, the state has made more college-level courses
available to students in high school. Students are being offered more Advanced
Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) courses , which provide
college credit if students score high enough on exams. Despite recent progress,
many education and business leaders remain concerned that Texas is not
producing enough high school graduates with the skills needed to succeed in
college or the workplace. To help address this concern the Texas Legislature directed
the State Board of Education (SBOE) to develop college readiness standards and
incorporate them into the TEKS, high school and college faculty are responsible
for developing college readiness standards in English language arts, math,
science and social studies.
Many students are not obtaining the advantages of recent
educational improvements. The most common reason for dropping out is falling
behind in school, the question here is, What can we do as students, parents or Texas
residents to help improve our education?
Friday, November 16, 2012
Commentary about Austin's Environment
Austin’s environment should be more important than what it
is now days. I completely agree with the article, people should take this
serious and stop messing with Austin. I would prefer the stores to forget about
the plastic bags and start using only the reusable bags. Stores need to start
charging for plastic bags in case people forget theirs. But there is other ways
to take care of the environment and “go green.” We can start at home, just by simply
taking shorter showers or skipping the bottle water and buy a reusable one
instead.
I don’t really think people would take advantage of the
reusable bags to steal from the grocery stores, if we think about it, people
does that already, so I don’t see why start using reusable bags will have any
cons.
I think Austin needs more “go green” campaigns. Just like
the Austin’s environment article states, “The more people are educated, the
better because it can spread throughout the local community and it will
eventually turn into something bigger from there.”
Friday, November 2, 2012
Minimum wage in Texas
The Texas Minimum Wage Act establishes a minimum wage for
non-exempt employees. On July 24th 2009, the minimum wage increased
to $7.25 an hour. Some 550,000 Texans, or 9.5 percent of hourly paid workers,
made the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour or less last year. The federal
poverty level for a family of three was $18,310 last year, which means a single parent with two children
and working for minimum wage would earn about $3,200 less than the poverty
level.
Raising the minimum wage is often a political issue.
Proponents, often labor unions and their supporters, argue that raising the
wage allows employees to earn more money and lead easier lives. In addition,
with more money coming in, individuals have more to spend, which boosts the
economy. There are at least two House bills that would increase the minimum
wage in some respect. The WAGE Act would set a base minimum wage for tipped
employees such as waiters and bartenders. If enacted this bill would raise the
minimum cash wage of such employees (excluding tips) over time from $2.13 to
$5.50 an hour. Meanwhile, the Living American Wage Act of 2011 would tie the
minimum wage level to the poverty threshold for a family of two individuals.
Both bills were introduced early in the year and seem to be stalled in committee.
The thing is that full-time workers can earn a living wage that allows them to
raise their families and pay for basic needs such as food, transportation, and
housing.
The minimum wage is supposed to be a living wage, however,
it has lost so much value over the years due to inflation that families who are
reliant on the minimum wage as their sole source of income are unable to afford
health care, food, rent, and transportation. Most families are deciding on
sharing a house or an apartment because they are always short of money every
month and many employers do not even allow their employees to work full time
because they are not required to provide benefits for their part-time workers. As
I said, I think the minimum wage should be $9.00 an hour, not $7.25 which is
equal to the price of a combo on a fast food restaurant.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Texas vs National Government
On April 9, 2012, the Long Star Strong published an article
about Texas rejecting the Obamacare and how the national government opposed to
the Texas ID voting card. 26 state attorneys were against the Obama
Administration on the health care law. One of them was the Texas Attorney,
General Greg Abbott. For some people who have no idea of who he is, he is a former
Texas Republican who challenge issues from voter ID to women’s health care. Another
issue they were debating about was Planned Parenthood. Hutchinson expressed “We
can’t afford to lose the Medicaid funding for low- income women.” Some
Democrats view the Medicaid funding as another “frivolous lawsuits.” While
Perry saw it as another attempt “To carry out the will of the people.” The
intended audiences are Texans over 18, since this article is about health care,
planning parenthood and Texas ID law. On the Texas ID law subject, the article
talks about how in early March, the U.S. Department of justice rejected the
Texas’ newly voted ID law, but Abbott fought back saying that the VRA exceeds
the enumerated powers of congress and conflicts with the constitution. The
author’s credibility is really good, since she shows the links of where she got
the information from. The text is well organized and easy to read. Even though she
doesn’t use many arguments to support the main point, which is the never ending
war between National Government and Texas.
In my opinion, she didn’t do a well job describing the
Obamacare. The Obamacare is not that bad after all. All this started two years
ago when Obama signed the reform. One of the requirements is that everyone
needs to buy health insurance so that way we will have universal coverage. The point
is, that whenever people without insurance go to hospitals, they won’t end up
paying crazy amounts. I will leave the link to the Long Star Strong and feel
free to leave any comments about how you feel about the article.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Water, water , water.
On Sep. 10, 2012, The Austin American Statesman published an
article about how water rules should be norm and how the lake was only 49% full.
The writer is trying to pursuade adults who live in the Austin and surrounding
areas.
The city started doing some water restrictions and
everything was based on the lake Travis’ water level. Honestly, I don’t think a
whole city should base their water restriction on how full a lake is. Austin
has a once-a-week watering restriction and there are only certain hours where
residents can waste that precious water. Just like the author says “Austin’s
watering restrictions shouldn’t be set to tighten when lake levels drop to a
certain point; instead, they should be set to loosen only when lake level rises
to near-full or full”. With this, the author is very clear about the argument,
if we are getting the restrictions because of the lakes water level, why we are
not going back to normal if the lake is almost half-full?
The author shows a good amount of evidence. According to the
writer, the stage 2 take effect when Lakes Buchanan and Travis drop to combined
900,000 acre-feet and they currently hold 882,531 acre-feet.
According to city estimates, 1200 trees on city land died
last year because of drought conditions. Some landowners are opting for Drip
irrigations because it’s more efficient than sprinklers and loses less water. It
is reasonable that residents need to be more precautious, we need to stop
wasting water because we never know how quickly the benefits of good rain can
vanish. Overall, the author describes how water rules should be norm in a very
organized way.
Friday, September 21, 2012
Texas jobs
On Friday, September 21, 2012 The Statesman published an
article about Texas jobs and how Austin metro area’s dropped to 5.9 percent
last month.
Since 2000, employers in Austin area have added an average
of 5,000 jobs. Texas unemployment did not budge in Austin, holding a 7.1
percent. However, Texas added 38,000
jobs in August far more than any other state. Most of those jobs came from staffing
agencies and construction. According to Mark Sprague those recent employment
gains should continue to increase as housing and commercial construction pick
up steam. But, if Texas is getting more jobs, why do I still know many people
who are unemployed? I think they still need more jobs and well-paid jobs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)